-->
Clayborne E. Chavers Esq. is a prominent Washington D.C. lawyer
practicing law for over 30 years. His law firm
The Chavers Law Firm focuses on
a wide variety of law practices including Intellectual Property, Arts,
Entertainment & Sports Law, Internet law, and Corporate Law to name a few.
In November of 1996 he was named as one of the top Arts and Entertainment lawyers
in the greater Washington D.C. area. In April of 2012 he was rated as AV
Preeminent Attorney. Among his notable achievements and acknowledgements he has
worked hard in the negotiation room working to get his clients the best deal
possible while satisfying the wants and needs of his clients.
One of the things that recording artist and bands need is a
good negotiator on the team. When that lucky artist or band gets to the
negotiation table at an indie or major record label that negotiator needs to be
able to get the best deal for both parties. In a recent phone interview with
Clay Chavers Esq I asked him three questions related to his experience with
negotiation. The first question was “How do you separate the people from the
problem?” He stated and I quote, “I am not sure you would separate the people
from the problem because with out the people the problem wouldn’t be something
that I would concern myself with. My
focus is on what’s best for the people I represent so if they have a problem I
would have to adjust that problem. The focus should be on how best to resolve
the problem.”
My second question to him was “How do you handle positional
bargaining tactics?” He stated and I quote “You have to justify or reconcile
what your position is specific to your opposition and its better to be in a
position where you are not being dictated to yet you are doing the dictating.
One way to achieve this he said is to let the other side make the offer and
then that gives you time access the offer and make your move on what you think
is best for your client in regards to that offer. The third question I asked
him was “Can you give me an example of how you worked toward mutual benefit
when you were negotiating a deal?” He stated and I quote, “You have to always
have everybody give a little something they want and give up a little something
they want. If you have a deal that is overly advantage to your client and not
to the person you are doing business with, they will be dissatisfied and find
ways to get out of it.” He also stated that “In every good deal everybody
should give up something and everybody should get something. If you don’t
achieve that it is unlikely you will have a relationship of long duration.”